文章摘要
管敏,王印庚,陈贵平,廖梅杰,潘鲁青,薛太山.不同类型附着基对刺参栖息趋向性的影响分析.渔业科学进展,2012,33(4):42-48
不同类型附着基对刺参栖息趋向性的影响分析
The effect of different artificial substrates on the inhabitation taxis of sea cucumber Apostichopus japonicus
投稿时间:2011-06-17  修订日期:2012-03-31
DOI:
中文关键词: 刺参  附着基  栖息  趋向性  平均聚集率
英文关键词: Apostichopus japonicus  Substrate  Inhabit  Taxis  MAR
基金项目:国家十二五863课题(2012AA10A412)、山东省农业良种工程重大课题、科研院所技术开发研究专项项目(2011EG34219)、国家自然科学基金项目(30901120)和青岛市科技计划项目(11-1-11-hy)
作者单位
管敏 中国海洋大学 海水养殖教育部重点实验室青岛266003农业部海洋渔业可持续发展重点实验室 中国水产科学研究院黄海水产研究所青岛266071 
王印庚 农业部海洋渔业可持续发展重点实验室 中国水产科学研究院黄海水产研究所青岛266071 
陈贵平 农业部海洋渔业可持续发展重点实验室 中国水产科学研究院黄海水产研究所青岛266071 
廖梅杰 农业部海洋渔业可持续发展重点实验室 中国水产科学研究院黄海水产研究所青岛266071 
潘鲁青 中国海洋大学 海水养殖教育部重点实验室青岛266003 
薛太山 青岛瑞滋海珍品发展有限公司266409 
摘要点击次数: 2600
全文下载次数: 3166
中文摘要:
      利用单位体积平均聚集数量(Average Gathered Number of Unit Volume,AGNUV)和平均聚集率(Mean Attractive Rate,MAR)统计分析了刺参对10种附着基(石块、三角瓦、U形瓦、遮阳网、网笼附着基、竹制附着基、三孔砖、涡流式异形瓦、大多棱瓦、小多棱瓦)和8种栖息分布区域(池壁面、池棱角、池底面、附着基上、附着基下、附着基棱角凹槽处、附着基内、附着基外)的选择趋向差异性。结果表明,不同类型附着基诱集刺参的效果为:大多棱瓦>石块>三孔砖>小多棱瓦>U形瓦>涡流式异形瓦>三角瓦>网笼附着基>遮阳网>竹制附着基,且大多棱瓦集参效果与三角瓦、网笼附着基、遮阳网、竹制附着基、涡流式异形瓦差异极显著。本研究还发现刺参在水泥池棱角处的MAR(21.02%)高于池壁面MAR(8.23%)和池底面的MAR(15.68%);刺参在附着基下方和附着基内部的MAR分别高于在附着基上方和附着基外部的MAR。此外,实验结果也表明,1)大多棱瓦附着基对刺参具有最佳诱集效果;2)刺参对栖息位置具有选择趋向性,且不同时间刺参对栖息位置的选择存在显著性差异;3)石块、网笼附着基、遮阳网不宜作为附着基。
英文摘要:
      By calculating and analyzing the average gathered number of unit volume (AGNUV) and the mean attractive rate (MAR) on ten types of artificial substrates and 8 distributional areas, the inhabitation taxis and selection of Apostichopus japonicus was estimated. The results showed that the attractive effect of 10 substrates was in the following descending order:big poly-arris tile, stone, three-hole brick, small poly-arris tile, U-shaped tile, eddy abnormity tile, triangle tile, cage substrate, sunshade net and bamboo substrate. There was significant difference between the big poly-arris tile and eddy abnormity tile, triangle tile, cage substrate, sunshade net and bamboo substrate. It also showed that the MAR of pool edge angle (21.02%) was higher than that of pool wall (8.23%) and pool bottom surface (15.68%), while the MAR underneath and inside of substrate was respectively higher than that of upside and surface. In addition, the experimental test approved the following: (1) The big poly-arris tile had the best performance in the attractive effect; (2) The sea cucumber had an habit that they tended to stay on different location at different time; (3) Stone, cage substrate and sunshade net were not suitable for sea cucumber culture. The attractive effect of several substrates was compared and analyzed in this study.
附件
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭